What is the role of Gunicorn or Uvicorn when deploying Python web apps?

What is the Role of Gunicorn or Uvicorn When Deploying Python Web Apps?

As you go through a Full Stack Python Course, beyond writing APIs or web pages, one essential skill is deployment — getting your app to run reliably in production. Two important tools in that phase are Gunicorn and Uvicorn. Let’s explore what they are, why you need them, how they differ, some stats, and how they relate to what you learn in a course like Full Stack Python.

What are Gunicorn & Uvicorn?

Gunicorn (Green Unicorn) is a WSGI HTTP server for Python. It’s been around for longer, and is well-suited for traditional synchronous web frameworks (like Flask, Django without async). It uses a pre-fork worker model, meaning it spawns multiple processes (“workers”) to handle concurrent requests.
Uvicorn is an ASGI server — designed for asynchronous (async) Python web apps. It uses modern async features (e.g. asyncio, coroutines), supports websockets, high concurrency, etc. It’s lighter weight, optimized for modern frameworks like FastAPI, Starlette.

Why Do We Need Them?

When you are developing locally, you might just run the built-in dev server (for Django, Flask, or FastAPI). But those are typically not suitable for production because they are single process or blocking in ways that limit concurrency, resilience, performance, etc.

Here’s what these tools give you:

Ability to handle multiple requests concurrently (via multiple workers/processes in Gunicorn, or via async in Uvicorn)
Management of processes: restarting them if they crash, scaling number of workers, graceful shutdowns etc.
More control over performance (worker count, threads, event loop choice, etc.)
Better compatibility with proxies/load-balancers and standards like ASGI or WSGI.

For example, the Uvicorn docs mention that in production it's common to use Gunicorn with Uvicorn workers, i.e.:


gunicorn -w 4 -k uvicorn.workers.UvicornWorker main:app

This gets you process management from Gunicorn plus async handling via Uvicorn.

Some Usage & Performance / Statistics

According to W3Techs (April 2025), both Gunicorn and Uvicorn are used by less than 0.1% of all websites whose server-technologies are known. That said, among high traffic / top-ranked sites the usage is slightly more noticeable for Gunicorn.
Benchmarks (from “Python Application Servers in 2025: From WSGI to Modern ASGI Solutions”) show approximate request-handling rates (a simple “Hello world” benchmark) like:

Gunicorn: ~10,000 requests/sec
Uvicorn: ~45,000 requests/sec
Hypercorn, Granian etc. similarly high for ASGI servers.
Memory footprint: in that same benchmark, base memory per worker is roughly 30 MB for Gunicorn, ~20 MB for Uvicorn.
In tests with Django (sync vs async), using Gunicorn with Uvicorn as worker shows roughly 3× faster throughput in async paths vs synchronous paths.

How This Relates to Full Stack Python Course

In a Full Stack Python Course, you typically learn:

Backend frameworks (Flask, Django, FastAPI)
Frontend + APIs + database etc.
Deployment (servers, cloud, containerization etc.)

Understanding how Gunicorn & Uvicorn work helps you make informed decisions:

When building an app with FastAPI (async), you’ll want Uvicorn (or Uvicorn worker under Gunicorn) so your app can scale well under high request load.
For simpler apps, maybe only with sync views, Gunicorn may suffice.
Learning to configure these (workers, performance, logging, restart policies) is a production-ready skill.

How I-Hub Talent Can Help

At I-Hub Talent, we offer Full Stack Python Courses designed especially for educational students who want not only to code but also to understand deployment, DevOps basics, performance optimisation, and production-grade tools. In our courses:

We teach both theory (WSGI vs ASGI, what concurrency/parallelism means, etc.) and hands-on labs deploying a FastAPI + Django + Flask app.
Students get to set up apps with Uvicorn, then configure them with Gunicorn in realistic setups (Docker, cloud servers, load-balancers).
We provide mentorship, code reviews, and sample benchmark exercises so you can see how much difference choice of server makes.

So by the time you finish our Full Stack Python Course at I-Hub Talent, you should feel confident picking and setting up the right server stack for your app’s needs.

Conclusion

In summary, Gunicorn and Uvicorn play crucial roles in deploying Python web applications: Gunicorn provides stable process management for many common web apps (especially synchronous ones), while Uvicorn brings in high concurrency, async support, and performance for modern Python web frameworks. For Full Stack students, knowing how and when to use each (or both) is a valuable skill. With our training at I-Hub Talent, you’ll gain both the understanding and hands-on experience to deploy your apps efficiently, reliably, and at scale — are you ready to master deployment with the right tools?

Search This Blog

Full Stack Python